US Security Efforts Falling Short of 9/11 To-Do List

There are numerous reasons why retired Admiral Dennis Blair was forced out as Director of National Intelligence, and this article addresses them.

US Security Efforts Falling Short of 9/11 To-Do List

Andrea StoneBy Andrea Stone

Thomas Kean, left, former chairman of the Sept. 11 commission, and former vice chairman Lee H. Hamilton, listen to comments by other panel members and reporters as they discuss progress on the recommendations of their 2004 report, during a news conference in Washington, Nov. 14, 2005. 

Thomas Kean, left, former chairman of the 9/11 Commission, and former Vice Chairman Lee H. Hamilton listen to comments by other panel members and reporters during a Nov. 14, 2005, news conference on the recommendations of the panel’s 2004 report.

WASHINGTON (May 21) — The downfall of retired Adm. Dennis Blair, who resigned Friday as director of national intelligence, came as yet another reminder that the best-laid plans for securing the nation against terrorism after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks haven’t all worked out.

The 9/11 Commission, whose findings were largely passed by Congress in 2004, outlined a series of security changes and improvements to thwart future attacks. While it is doubtful that the commission’s recommendations, if implemented, would have made the nation totally safe, they were aimed at reducing the odds of a successful terrorist plot.

“There is a much greater sense of the need for cooperation and the sharing of information compared to the intramural hoarding among different agencies that was evident prior to 9/11,” Richard Ben-Veniste, a 9/11 Commission member, told AOL News. “But events like Times Square and the Christmas Day plot show how much more needs to be done.”

One of the commission’s central recommendations was to establish the Office of the Director of National Intelligence to oversee and coordinate the CIA and 15 other civilian and military intelligence agencies. The commission urged that the DNI “receive a public appropriation for national intelligence, should have authority to hire and fire his or her intelligence deputies, and should be able to set common personnel and information technology policies across the intelligence community.”

Congress agreed to none of that. The result was that Blair’s tenure has been troubled from the start, and his two hamstrung predecessors didn’t fare much better. “There is a fundamental lack of clarity in the mission” of the DNI, 9/11 Commission vice chairman Lee Hamilton told AOL News.

Hamilton and Commission Chairman Tom Kean testified on Capitol Hill this week, telling the House Homeland Security Committee that some of their key recommendations have not been implemented or have been carried out haphazardly.

Among the concerns and to-do items left over since 9/11:

1. Not Connecting Enough Dots: A scathing report by the Senate Select Intelligence Committee on the Christmas Day bomb plot said the National Counterterrorism Center — created after 9/11 to coordinate and analyze data from 16 intelligence agencies — was “not adequately organized and did not have resources appropriately allocated to fulfill its missions.”

2. Take Another Look: A new government report slams a program that the Transportation Security Administration started in 2003 to nab would-be terrorists at airports based on suspicious behavior. The Government Accountability Office said TSA deployed the SPOT program even though a “scientific consensus does not exist on whether behavior detection principles can be reliably used for counterterrorism purposes.”

3. Can You Hear Me Now? A 2005 report card by the 9/11 Public Discourse Project gave an F to local, state and federal agencies in allocating more radio spectrum and improving connectivity for first-responder communications. Five years later, “[w]e still haven’t solved the problem to permit all first responders to seamlessly talk to one another at the scene of a disaster,” Hamilton said.

4. Who’s In Charge? The 9/11 Commission urged Congress to streamline its oversight of intelligence and homeland security, setting up a joint committee or a single committee in each house to deal with budget and policy issues. Yet congressional leaders have refused to give up their fiefdoms, resulting in, by Rep. Peter King’s calculations, 108 committees and subcommittees with jurisdiction. “It’s entirely dysfunctional,” said King, the top Republican on the House Homeland Security Committee.

5. Big Brother Is Watching:
The Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, created after 9/11 to advise the executive branch and oversee government efforts to defend civil liberties, has been dormant since 2007. President Barack Obama hasn’t appointed members, despite repeated pleas from Rep. Jane Harman and other congressional Democrats. There is “no board protecting civil liberties,” Kean testified. “We’ve got massive capacity now to develop data and individuals and we need somebody to ensure that the collection capabilities do not violate our privacy and the liberties we care about.”

6. Look Homeward: All eyes looked abroad for bad guys after 9/11, yet as the fizzled Times Square bombing and at least two dozen other cases demonstrate, homegrown terrorist plots by born or naturalized Americans are growing. “We don’t really think that domestic intelligence has received enough attention,” Kean said, adding that the FBI must “reform itself and build an organization that places more emphasis on preventing attacks.”

Said Roger Cressey, a counterterrorism expert in the Bill Clinton and George W. Bush administrations: “The government is really good at thinking about the previous threat. Where we need to do a better job is to see where the threat is evolving.”

This entry was posted in current events, news. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to US Security Efforts Falling Short of 9/11 To-Do List

  1. HybridTalk says:

    AG Holder can’t even bring himself to call the terrorists “terrorists” so what do you expect. Obama and his team are in bed with BP and al Qadea.

  2. therealgirlscout says:

    Obama is in bed with BP???? Isn’t that what you republicans want? Drill, baby, drill and all that? (we see where that has gotten us…now that the whole Gulf of Mexico, marine life, beaches, fishing industry, etc. is completely fucked up from the oil leaking out by the millions of gallons everyday). Hope that bed is big enough for Obama to join BP, because Bush was there first.

  3. therealgirlscout says:

    Obama has put a stop to drilling in the Arctic region because of this tragedy. GOOD! At least the Arctic won’t get screwed up like the Gulf did! I think BP would be kicking Obama out of bed right now…..

  4. Hacksaw says:

    Drilling on land (like At ANWAR or closer offshore) is considerably safer and making it much easier to deal with “complications” like our current spill than having to drill miles offshore where the water is about very deep, forced that far out by environmentalist wackos who will never be satisfied, despite the fact that we need & use oil and if we don’t drill for & process it ourselves, then we have to buy it from other Nations, some of which are not our friends and other countries continue to drill off our shores anyway, especially if we are unwilling to.

  5. therealgirlscout says:

    ENVIRONMENTALIST WACKO, and PROUD of it! Personally, I consider people who think it’s okay to screw up our environment a WACKO of a different sort.

  6. Hacksaw says:

    It’s not okay to screw up the environment, but accidents do happen from time to time. I also don’t believe that all environmentalists are wacko, but alot of them are but I think that we all can agree the depth & temperature of the water that this tragedy has occurred in has severely hampered all previous efforts to “just plug the damned hole” and if the leak were either on land, or a lot closer to the shore, it would already be capped and the lengthy cleanup & recovery process would be underway.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s