Obama Administration OKs First Tax-Funded Abortions Under Health Care Law

I don’t really care too much if someone chooses to kill their innocent, unborn child via abortion even if I believe it’s wrong, but I sure as hell do not wish to be forced to pay for it!


  by Steven Ertelt






Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) — The Obama administration has officially approved the first instance of taxpayer funded abortions under the new national government-run health care program. This is the kind of abortion funding the pro-life movement warned about when Congress considered the bill.

The Obama Administration will give Pennsylvania $160 million to set up a new “high-risk” insurance program under a provision of the federal health care legislation enacted in March.

It has quietly approved a plan submitted by an appointee of pro-abortion Governor Edward Rendell under which the new program will cover any abortion that is legal in Pennsylvania.

The high-risk pool program is one of the new programs created by the sweeping health care legislation, Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, President Obama signed into law on March 23. The law authorizes $5 billion in federal funds for the program, which will cover as many as 400,000 people when it is implemented nationwide.

“The Obama Administration will give Pennsylvania $160 million in federal tax funds, which we’ve discovered will pay for insurance plans that cover any legal abortion,” said Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee.

Johnson told LifeNews.com: “This is just the first proof of the phoniness of President Obama’s assurances that federal funds would not subsidize abortion — but it will not be the last.”

“President Obama successfully opposed including language in the bill to prevent federal subsidies for abortions, and now the Administration is quietly advancing its abortion-expanding agenda through administrative decisions such as this, which they hope will escape broad public attention,” Johnson said.

The abortion funding comes despite language in the bill that some pro-abortion Democrats and Obama himself claimed would prevent abortion funding and despite a controversial executive order Obama signed supposedly stopping abortion funding.

The pro-life community strongly opposed the executive order and said Rep. Bart Stupak and other House Democrats who voted for the pro-abortion health care bill in exchange for it were selling out their pro-life principles. This first case of forcing taxpayers to pay for abortions under the new law appears to prove them right that the bill language and executive order were ineffective.

Proving the point further that the abortion funding comes from federal taxpayer dollars, Johnson explained that the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has emphasized that the high-risk pool program is a federal program and that the states will not incur any cost.

On May 11, 2010, in a letter to Democratic and Republican congressional leaders on implementation of the new law, DHHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius wrote that “states may choose whether and how they participate in the program, which is funded entirely by the federal government.”

Johnson says that on June 28, Pennsylvania Insurance Commissioner Joel Ario (a member of the appointed cabinet of Governor Edward Rendell, a Democrat) issued a press release announcing that the federal Department of Health and Human Services had approved his agency’s proposal for implementing the new program in Pennsylvania.

“The state will receive $160 million to set up the program, which will provide coverage to as many as 5,600 people between now and 2014,” according to the release. “The plan’s benefit package will include preventive care, physician services, diagnostic testing, hospitalization, mental health services, prescription medications and much more, with subsidized premiums of $283 a month.”

Johnson says the “much more” Ario refers to is abortion funding.

The section on abortion (see page 14) asserts that “elective abortions are not covered,” though it does not define elective — which Johnson calls a “red herring.”

The proposal specifies coverage “includes only abortions and contraceptives that satisfy the requirements of” several specific statutes, the most pertinent of which is 18 Pa. C.S. § 3204, which says abortion is legal in Pennsylvania. The statute essentially says all abortions except those to determine the sex of the baby are legal.

“Under the Rendell-Sebelius plan, federal funds will subsidize coverage of abortion performed for any reason, except sex selection,” said NRLC’s Johnson. “The Pennsylvania proposal conspicuously lacks language that would prevent funding of abortions performed as a method of birth control or for any other reason, except sex selection — and the Obama Administration has now approved this.”

This entry was posted in abortion, current events, Government Spending, news. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Obama Administration OKs First Tax-Funded Abortions Under Health Care Law

  1. hybridtalk1 says:

    You mean the Obama team and Democrat leaders LIED to the American people about this?

    I thought they were going to be different.

  2. hybridtalk1 says:

    Wish I could abort the Obama administration and Congress.

  3. mzkatie says:

    “..abortions performed as a method of birth control..”

    I love that people are considering abortion a type of birth control. (That’s sarcastic.) Wow.

  4. polarbear20 says:

    Good!! It’s a legitimate medical procedure and should be covered. You’d be singing a different tune if you needed an abortion and couldn’t pay for it.

  5. princess says:

    PB, “need” an abortion? when does one “NEED” an abortion?

    hybrid, of COURSE they lied……….that’s what they do.

    we should rebrand the democrats as the liarcrats…….LOL

    • polarbear20 says:

      when does one “NEED” an abortion?

      Uhhh, after a rape. In a medical emergency.

      Or are you a “good little christen” who thinks rape victims should be PUNISHED by being forced to carry the seed of their attacker to full term? And if mother’s health is in danger, sorry mom. You get to DIE and your offspring get to be orphans!!

      Compassionate christen, talk about a major oxymoron!!

  6. princess says:

    hmmmmm how to answer your stupid baloney AGAIN!!!

    find a REAL person, a REAL case of where Mom’s life is in danger. find me ONE. typically, when a woman cannot give birth without dying, they already KNOW this BEFORE the pregnancy…………….

    and find another REAL case of RAPE and pregnancy. a REAL one PB.

    i suppose it DOES happen……….but a child is NEVER EVER a PUNISHMENT. EVER.

    there is ALWAYS adoption…………it is ALWAYS an option. ALWAYS.

  7. mzkatie says:

    I don’t agree with either of you. “Birth control” is the steps taken to prevent pregnancy. If a girl is having an abortion, she is obvi already pregnant. That’s NOT birth control.
    However, the women should have the right to choose.

    I’m ALL for women having the right to choose abortion, but there is no way in hell that taxpayers should have to pay for it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s