Self-described “civil rights advocates” say that a ballot proposition to ban circumcision is on track for gathering signatures, meaning that San Franciscans may vote on the measure this November.
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/news/politics/116618063.html?1
I suppose tattooing, piercings and stabbing babies in the back of the head with scissors before sucking out their brains and crushing their skulls to make removal easier, and perhaps Muslim “female circumcision” (clitorectomy) will still be encouraged. Most assuredly sex change operations (especially those paid for by tax dollars) will still be available too.
dprin339
Hacksaw
hittosan
hybridtalk1
myfoxmystere
mzkatie
polarbear20
therealgirlscout
Cleveland Foxers 
It was just reported on the news that Attorney General Holder announced that the U.S. Justice Department can no longer defend the Defense of Marriage Act, mainly it’s definition of marriage in the United States as “between 1 man & 1 woman”.
This means they are probably partying in the streets in San Fran & other cities with large populations of gays, and between this & the abrupt repeal of DADT, it is apparent that the Obama Administration is now pandering to homosexuals, and is counting on them to turn out in support of him in 2012 to replace the large numbers of independents & others who supported him in 2008, but have since regretted it and will not make that same mistake again.
LikeLike
This is good news. President Obama’s style of dictator rule can help the next Republican President.
Now the R President can ignore Abortion laws (Roe vs Wade) and Obamacare and anything they don’t like.
THANKS our great dictator and expert on all things lawless, President Obama!!!
LikeLike
Megyn Kelly interviewed the guy who is pushing this asinine legislation, ‘Intactivist’ Lloyd Schofield.
http://video.foxnews.com/v/4555238/circumcision-ban-in-san-francisco/?playlist_id=87651
LikeLike
and that refusal to defend our LAW (the defense of marriage act) could end up biting the “ONE” in the butt.
there are NOW calls for impeachment of the “ONE” over this.
our president MUST obey & defend OUR laws….whether he likes them or not, whether he considers them “fair” or not, whether he considers the “constitutional” or not.
the only way he can avoid obeying & defending them is to repeal them.
he has not bothered to do so as of yet.
let’s hope this call for impeachment actually gets some “legs” and works.
LikeLike
President Obama could theoretically be impeached, all it takes is a simple majority in the House and Republicans have that, but conviction by the Senate & removal from office would take a 2/3 majority which would virtually never happen barring him screwing up royally like Nixon did, being recorded & proven to be trying to cover up crimes. (almost like the Department of Justice’s staunch refusal to prosecute the New Black Panther party for it’s videotaped election day voter intimidation in Philadelphia)
Impeaching this “naked Emporor” could simply turn him into a sympatheic figure, and Speaker John Boehner into a perceived “villian”, much the way it did for Slick Willie Clinton & Speaker Newt Gingrich – that could get him re-elected, Heaven forbid! 😦 I like the way our Congress is currently dealing with him, especially the GOP controlled House – they are reigning in the spending, forcing cuts and shining a bright spotlight on the DOJ’s selective & racially motivated enforcement or lack thereof of this Nation’s existing laws.
LikeLike